1951 Austin Princess vs. 1973 Chrysler Charger

To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1951 Austin Princess. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin Princess weights approximately 575 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (486 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin Princess. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Austin Princess 1973 Chrysler Charger
Make Austin Chrysler
Model Princess Charger
Year Released 1951 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3990 cc 5899 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 124 HP 252 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 288 Nm 486 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1955 kg 1380 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2680 mm