1951 Austin Princess vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Austin Princess (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin Princess weights approximately 773 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Austin Princess (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1951 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin Princess | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Princess | Celica |
Year Released | 1951 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3990 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 288 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2640 mm |