1951 BMW 340 vs. 1982 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1982 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 198 kg more than 1951 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 1982 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 340 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1951 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1448 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |