1951 BMW 340 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 230 kg more than 1951 BMW 340.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 BMW 340 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 340 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |
