1951 BMW 340 vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Clio (62 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 BMW 340 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio.
Because 1951 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 340 | Clio |
Year Released | 1951 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |