1951 BMW 340 vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 BMW 340 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | 340 | M250 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2520 mm |