1951 BMW 340 vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (230 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Renault Clio weights approximately 450 kg more than 1951 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 BMW 340 | 2001 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 340 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2750 mm |
