1951 BMW 340 vs. 2002 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1428 kg more than 1951 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 BMW 340 | 2002 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 340 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3310 mm |
