1951 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (217 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1951 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 340 | V50 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2720 mm |