1951 BMW 340 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 123 kg more than 1951 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 BMW 340 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 340 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1373 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
