1951 BMW 340 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 BMW 340 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 340 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 259 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
