1951 BMW 340 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340.
Because 1951 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 340 | Impala |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2810 mm |