1951 BMW 340 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340.
Because 1951 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 340 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |