1951 BMW 340 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340.
Because 1951 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 340 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2619 mm |