1951 BMW 340 vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 905 kg more than 1951 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 340 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1885 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2789 mm |