1951 BMW 340 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 608 kg more than 1951 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 BMW 340 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 340 | CTS |
Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1442 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2880 mm |