1951 Bristol 400 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1951 Bristol 400 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1951 Bristol 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 400 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 400 | 62 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3210 mm |