1951 Bristol 400 vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1963 Lotus Elite is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Bristol 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elite (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Bristol 400 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 400 | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Bristol | Lotus |
| Model | 400 | Elite |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 29 L |
