1951 Bristol 400 vs. 1985 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Bristol 400. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Bristol 400.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 400 | 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 400 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1951 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |