1951 Bristol 400 vs. 2000 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2000 Nissan El Grand is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 800 kg more than 1951 Bristol 400.
Because 1951 Bristol 400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Bristol 400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 400 | 2000 Nissan El Grand | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | 400 | El Grand |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1950 mm |