1951 Bristol 401 vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1963 Lincoln Continental is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1951 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 401 | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Bristol | Lincoln |
| Model | 401 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3210 mm |
