1951 Bristol 401 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1969 Zastava 850 K is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Bristol 401 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 401 (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 401 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Bristol 401 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 401 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Bristol | Zastava |
| Model | 401 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2010 mm |
