1951 Bristol 401 vs. 1971 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 905 kg more than 1951 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 401 | 1971 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 401 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 8192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 223 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3220 mm |
