1951 Bristol 450 vs. 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220. (118 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | Bristol | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 450 | 220 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 72.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |