1951 Bristol 450 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne weights approximately 1077 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 450 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | 450 | Biscayne |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 98.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 89.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1807 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3090 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 87 L |
