1951 Bristol 450 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 190 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450.
Because 1951 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Bristol | Mitsubishi |
Model | 450 | Colt |
Year Released | 1951 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2390 mm |