1951 Bristol 450 vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 450 | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Bristol | Mazda |
| Model | 450 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |
