1951 Bristol 450 vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Bristol 450 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 1999 MCC Smart | |
Make | Bristol | MCC |
Model | 450 | Smart |
Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 63.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 63 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2280 mm |