1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 750 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 450 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |
