1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1595 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 450 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3510 mm |