1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (292 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 450 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 95 L |