1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet HHR. (149 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet HHR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 345 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450.
Because 1951 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 2008 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 450 | HHR |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |