1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Ford F-450
To start off, 2008 Ford F-450 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford F-450 (350 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 450 | 2008 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | F-450 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 6670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 4390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 144 L |
