1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1248 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 450 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2499 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |