1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450.
Because 1951 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 450 | 2009 Cadillac DTS | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | DTS |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
