1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ka weights approximately 325 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450.
Because 1951 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 2009 Ford Ka | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 450 | Ka |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 35 L |