1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 292 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 450 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1022 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 74 L |
