1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1944 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 450 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 98 L |