1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 182 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Bristol 450 | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Bristol | Audi |
Model | 450 | RS3 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 335 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |