1951 Bristol 450 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1951 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1038 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Bristol 450 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1768 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |
