1951 Buick 40 vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1963 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 507 kg more than 1951 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Buick 40 | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2050 mm |
