1951 Buick 40 vs. 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado
To start off, 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Buick 40 | 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado | |
| Make | Buick | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 40 | Toronado |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 6967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 104.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 101 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3030 mm |
