1951 Buick 40 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick 40 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Buick | Dodge |
Model | 40 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1951 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 421 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2800 mm |