1951 Buick 40 vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 1982 Buick Century is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick 40 (119 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1982 Buick Century. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Century.
Because 1951 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick 40 (292 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Buick Century. (224 Nm). This means 1951 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick 40 | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Buick | Buick |
Model | 40 | Century |
Year Released | 1951 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 224 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2662 mm |