1951 Buick 40 vs. 1989 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1989 Ford RS 200 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 453 kg more than 1989 Ford RS 200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 292 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick 40 | 1989 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1804 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 77.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2410 mm |