1951 Buick 40 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1951 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Buick 40 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Buick | Rover |
| Model | 40 | 200 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
