1951 Buick 40 vs. 1999 Holden Astra

To start off, 1999 Holden Astra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Holden Astra (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Holden Astra should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1999 Holden Astra.

Because 1951 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Astra. (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1951 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Astra.

Compare all specifications: