1951 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Citroen Saxo

To start off, 2000 Citroen Saxo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick 40 (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 830 kg more than 2000 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1951 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Saxo.

Compare all specifications: