1951 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick 40 (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero weights approximately 270 kg more than 1951 Buick 40.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (309 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Buick 40 | 2000 Mitsubishi Montero | |
| Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 40 | Montero |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 309 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2510 mm |
