1951 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 855 kg more than 1951 Buick 40.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick 40 | 2003 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2490 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2960 mm |